Centralized world power and Net censorship

Centralized world power and Freedom of Speech cannot coexist!

We live in a small world where the actual power structure is hidden and centralized. On the other hand, the Net is all about freedom of speech. Clearly, centralized power and the Net cannot coexist. It is obvious that centralized power is well entrenched so naturally it is the Net that has to back off. This backing off manifests itself in many ways such as malware, P2P clogging, complexity and cost of Internet access, sluggish roll-out, non standard components, obsolescence, information overload, lack of customization and so on.

But the most sinister factor is Google's dominance. The lack of competition allows Google to stick to its keyword centric syntactic strategy where it is able to censor websites much more easily. This SIGNAL vs NOISE kind of censorship is able to confuse even the most determined searchers. In any case, Google is more about Ads than about Search.

The only way to bypass such censorship seems to be to search on the basis of authors as opposed to keywords. This is the only way to keep the SIGNAL NOISE ratio from getting out of control. What is more worrying is not ideology, it is spin. This is the reason we should give up even on authors and follow only individual commenters. The logic is that authors are looking for numbers and only spins see propagation.

To follow individual commenters, we can click on their names, which is usually a link to their website or a page containing other comments made by them. We can also try and Google their name. Savvy commenters pick quirky (hopefully unique) screen names for this very purpose.

But never mind, here too, our rulers have found a way out: botnets. The common perception is that botnets are moronic spreaders of spam and some of the less moronic botnets even try and phish out our passwords. To a certain extent this is true because email is the purest form of addressability so our rulers need spam to dilute it. And also financial scams and economic hardship have forever been used to keep people under control. That such actions keep the insurance and security companies humming is welcome too.

In actual fact, botnets are highly sophisticated networks which are not only able to unceasingly dodge detection but also troll ALL forums and add to the NOISE everywhere. Even complex captchas are no deterrents to these sophisticated bots. It is amazing how many of the comments posted are actually from sophisticated trolls that never be exposed because these behave like human commenters and come from innocent IPs. Recent studies have confirmed that botnets use SEO techniques to capture search engine traffic on controversial keywords.

Moral of the story: Suspect anything and everything because PERCEPTION CONTROL is the biggest game in town.

Internet Censorship Alert

Internet Censorship Alert: Alex Jones exposes agenda to 'blacklist' dissenting sites (March 14, 2010) As I predicted, the Obama Administration is trying to shut down the Internet - at least the parts he doesn't like. Barack Obamas regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein has stated that he wants to ban conspiracy theories from the internet. Think about what this means - Every video, every website, every blog, every email, that exposes or just criticizes the government for any reason whatsoever could be labeled a "conspiracy" and taken down. Your home could be raided in the middle of the night, and you could be carted of to jail for criticizing the government. All they have to do is call it a "conspiracy theory". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqAWmBLFodE

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

IndyMac bank run: A sign of things to come?

IndyMac bank run: A sign of things to come?
Harry Koza
July 18, 2008

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080718.RKOZA18/TPStory/Business

That's kind of odd, since it was a substantial flameout. Indy was the second-largest mortgage lender in the United States, and the seventh-largest savings and loan, with $32-billion (U.S.) in assets and $19-billion in deposits - $1-billion uninsured. It was the biggest bank failure in years. Since 2000, according to the FDIC, there have been 32 bank failures in the United States, with IndyMac the fifth one so far in 2008 and bigger than all the other 31 put together.

The FDIC has another 90 to 150 banks on its list of "troubled" lenders, so it seems likely that there will be more banks going under in the months ahead. Somehow that doesn't seem to bode too well for all those predictions of a second-half recovery this year, you know, that mythical V-shaped chart form, dipping quickly into recession only to storm back up into a new boom.

Investors Moving Money to Swiss Banks

Investors Moving Money to Swiss Banks Fearing U.S. Sub-Mortgage Crisis and IndyMac Bank Closure
Kevin Wessell
Los Angeles, CA (PRWEB) August 5, 2008

http://www.prweb.com/releases/Offshore/Banking/prweb1177124.htm

Europe has multitudes of large, safe, banks without exposure to the damaging U.S. mortgage disaster. In contrast, many U.S. banks are sitting on shaky ground. It is said that two banking giants, Washington Mutual and Bank of America - with the acquisition of Countrywide Financial - have substantial sub-prime exposure. This is not to say one should necessarily lose faith in these giant organizations. It is just to say that they are feeling the financial pain of the recent disaster. First National Bank of Nevada, based in Reno, Nevada, and First Heritage Bank of Newport Beach, Calif., were both shut down by federal regulators recently.

IndyMac Collapse Fuels Fears About WaMu

IndyMac Collapse Fuels Fears About WaMu
by Wendy Kaufman
All Things Considered, July 17, 2008
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92642046

Biggest U.S. Bank Failures: Four of the top 10 biggest failed U.S. banks and thrifts were based in California.

1. Continental Illinois National Bank, Chicago (1984) - $40 billion in assets
2. IndyMac Bank, Pasadena, Calif. (2008) - $32.2 billion (as of March 31)
3. American Savings & Loan, Stockton, Calif. (1988) - $30.2 billion
4. First RepublicBank, Dallas (1988) - $17.1 billion
5. Bank of New England, Boston (1991) - $13.4 billion
6. Gibraltar Savings, Simi Valley, Calif. (1989) - $13.4 billion
7. HomeFed Bank, San Diego (1992) - $12.2 billion
8. Southeast Bank, Miami (1991) - $11.0 billion
9. Goldome, Buffalo, N.Y. (1991) - $9.9 billion
10. City Savings (1989) Somerset, N.J. - $9.8 billion

Source: FDIC

Sunday, August 3, 2008

Will Europe Collapse Before the United States?

Will Europe Collapse Before the United States?
John Hoefle
Executive Intelligence Review
July 25, 2008
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2008/3529europe_collapse_b4_us.html

We are not arguing that the European economy is in worse shape than that of the U.S., for both are caught in the grip of the failure of the global financial system, and both are bankrupt. What gives the United States an advantage over Europe is the superior features of the U.S. Constitutional system, which gives the U.S. Congress control over the emission of credit. In the parts of Europe dominated historically by the Venetians and the Anglo-Dutch Liberal system, private capital has always dominated governments. In the British Empire it is not the British government which rules, or even the Queen, but the City of London, and the financier slime mold which controls the City.

The U.S., on the other hand, has all the authority it needs under the Constitution to reign in these private flows of capital, giving it powerful tools with which to keep the imperial parasites at bay. Franklin Roosevelt, for example, used the power of government to break the back of the bankers during the Great Depression, paving the way for the New Deal. The hearings into the causes of the banking crisis and the legislation which followed, delivered a blow to the British-controlled House of Morgan from which it never fully recovered, sending a signal around the world that the U.S. was not only capable, but determined, to defend itself and its people.

The End of the Anglo-American Empire?

The End of the Anglo-American Empire?
http://www.australia.to/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=348:richard-c-cook&catid=1:latest
Aug 3, 2008

Another gang has been those among the world’s money-lenders who became experts at parasitic high finance and got rich through the explosive growth of fractional reserve banking. These people have dominated the economies of nations through such institutions as the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve System, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), and other central and commercial banks, currency and commodity exchanges, and stock and bond markets.

The bankers on the one hand and the political racketeers on the other merged over a century ago under the oversight of figures associated with the creation of the Anglo-American Empire, such as Cecil Rhodes, Lord Milner, Colonel House, Winston Churchill, the House of Windsor, and, as examples of families involved, the Rothschilds, Schiffs, Morgans, Harrimans, Rockefellers, Myers, and Bushes. Among the major projects of the empire in recent decades have been the creation and maintenance of both the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the state of Israel as Western bridgeheads of influence, power, and wealth in the Middle East .

Central bank body warns of Great Depression

Central bank body warns of Great Depression
http://www.bankingtimes.co.uk/09062008-central-bank-body-warns-of-great-depression/
by Gill Montia
June 9, 2008

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the organisation that fosters cooperation between central banks, has warned that the credit crisis could lead world economies into a crash on a scale not seen since the 1930s.

In its latest quarterly report, the body points out that the Great Depression of the 1930s was not foreseen and that commentators on the financial turmoil, instigated by the US sub-prime mortgage crisis, may not have grasped the level of exposure that lies at its heart.

According to the BIS, complex credit instruments, a strong appetite for risk, rising levels of household debt and long-term imbalances in the world currency system, all form part of the loose monetarist policy that could result in another Great Depression.

Fla. Bank Shuttered; SunTrust to Take Over Branches

Fla. Bank Shuttered; SunTrust to Take Over Branches
By David Mildenberg and Alison Vekshin
Bloomberg News
Saturday, August 2, 2008; Page D03

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/01/AR2008080103409.html

The pace of closings is accelerating. Banks and securities firms have reported more than $480 billion in writedowns and credit losses since 2007, when three banks were shuttered.

Regulators in July closed IndyMac Bancorp, a California-based mortgage lender with $32 billion in assets, the third-largest bank seizure in U.S. history.

"The only thing sure other than death and taxes is that deposit insurance premiums will be going up as more banks fail," said Gerard Cassidy, an analyst with RBC Capital Markets in Portland, Maine. He expects 300 U.S. banks to fail in the next several years, mainly because of mounting losses from real estate-related loans.